Sanders also protested the disqualification, ‘en mass,’ of 58 of his delegates. “Sanders went on to denounce the way the Nevada state convention was conducted, saying Lange should at the very least have held a head-count rather than a yay/nay voice vote, and accusing her of refusing to acknowledge motions from the floor or accept any petitions for amendments, in violation of the rules. Clinton backers responded by calling for the disruptive Sanders delegates’ arrests. “According to various reports, Sanders supporters yelled, threw chairs and booed Clinton surrogate Barbara Boxer, incensed by a process they saw as rigged in Clinton’s favor. Sanders issued a critical statement reported by Rolling Stone, in “ WTF Happened at the Nevada Democratic State Convention?”: Some said that coin tosses for Clinton were unfair in Iowa, but there’s no publicly available data that could prove that.ĪG: In 2016, however, violence erupted after a yay/nay voice vote was held at the Nevada State Democratic Convention because Clinton had been awarded 20 delegates to the national nominating convention, Sanders 15. Occasionally, there are accusations of unfair die-meaning an unfair coin toss or other unfair means of resolving a tie by chance. ![]() “ It’s a lot more difficult to rig a caucus than a primary.” A caucus is done out in the open-people engage with one another and everyone can see the outcome. People are counted visually as standing on one side of the room or the other. RCB: We did not look into caucuses because there is no publicly available data, but it’s a lot more difficult to rig a caucus than a primary. The process is not identical from state to state). For an explanation of how caucuses work, see Business Insider. We simply merged it all together and noticed strange patterns.ĪG: Did you also look into results in the states that choose delegates at caucuses rather than statewide elections? (In 2016, eight states held caucuses rather than statewide polls: Iowa, Alaska, Nevada, North Dakota, Kansas, Wyoming, Hawaii, Kentucky-Republican only, Maine, and Washington-Democratic only. RCB: All the data we reported is publicly available. RCB: I collaborated with Axel Geijsel, a cognitive psychologist in the Netherlands.ĪG: Can you explain how you went about collecting data? Their strictly statewide electronic voting could be considered a form of voter suppression.ĪG: And did you conduct that research alone or were you working with someone else? Results are most reliable in Oregon, Massachusetts, and Vermont. You can go to Verified Voting to see a map of the methods used across the US. Voting methods vary from state to state and from county to county within states. In states with paper ballots, Clinton won 49%, Sanders 51%. Clinton won 65%, Bernie Sanders 35% in those states. However, we found that there were more discrepancies in states with strictly electronic voting machines. For example, everyone knew that there were discrepancies between most exit polls and reported polls. Rodolfo Cortes Barragan: We saw irregularities in vote patterns. I spoke to him about the study.Īnn Garrison: Rodolfo, what were the results of your study of returns in the 2016 presidential election? ![]() ![]() He and a colleague conducted a study that turned up strange patterns in presidential electoral results in 2016. Rodolfo Cortes Barragan holds a PhD in cognitive psychology from Stanford University. “ The most preferable method is hand-counted paper ballots, next most preferable are paper ballots scanned by some sort of machine.” Investigators call it “strange patterns in data”- that saw Hillary Clinton win primaries with electronic ballots, and Bernie Sanders victorious in paper ballot states.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |